There’s no reason for you to be using network file shares if you’re also using Microsoft Teams. Something else that needs to be considered are file shares. However, in this modern world where the Skype for Business client replacement is considerably more powerful and feature rich, governance now has to apply to the entire Office 365 stack. When people talk about governance in relation to Office 365, it’s usually in the context of SharePoint as that is where it originated. One of the biggest things that needs addressing is governance.
#Skype for business mac client sucks full#
So what to do? Your users are getting the full Microsoft Teams client and all that it brings with it, whether you are ready or not. If you simply upgraded to Teams Lite client from the Skype for Business client you wouldn’t have to change behaviours around email, attachments, file shares, switching between multiple apps, or the way you work now in general. Skype For Business End Of Life Dates Skype Product
#Skype for business mac client sucks upgrade#
Why?īecause Microsoft doesn’t just want you to upgrade your Skype for Business client – they want you to use the full feature set of Microsoft Teams and change the way you work. While this has been discussed and there have been nods from Microsoft folks, it most likely will never happen. Well, there have been rumblings of and requests (myself included) for a “Teams Lite” client that only gives people access to Skype for Business features. What does all this have to do with the Skype for Business client? Teams users also gain access to a SharePoint site and all its wonderful, modern features. That’s because all the file storage of Microsoft Teams is delivered by SharePoint & OneDrive. Implementing Microsoft Teams means organisations are implementing SharePoint & OneDrive, even if they haven’t deliberately done it yet. What I am saying, however, is that it is solely a communications tool. By no means am I saying that Skype for Business is simple, or that it didn’t introduce new features and ways of working. What I’m referring to here is the difference between the initial migration and upgrade journey to Skype for Business from communications tools at the time, versus the move from Skype for Business to Microsoft Teams. Having a Skype for Business replacement with a platform that provides similar functionality and a few more features is one thing, but replacing it with one that provides a considerably larger number of features is a much bigger deal. This means that Teams is giving Office 365 users access to SharePoint Online document libraries and site functionality, OneNote, Planner, and a whole bunch of other features. When you think about this in the context of the rest of the Office 365 stack, Microsoft Teams adds an extra layer of functionality on top of Office 365 Groups.
What this effectively means is that Teams is a single pane of glass for people to communicate, collaborate, and ultimately work. You see, Microsoft Teams is not just a unified communication product it’s a collaboration tool, a window into other apps and services, (or, as it is being positioned by Microsoft, an “app hub”). However, this also presents a different challenge when it comes to Microsoft Teams. Ultimately cutting down the number of tools that do similar/the same things in Office 365 (now Microsoft 365), such as Skype and Teams, does indeed help to alleviate end user confusion.
GET OUR NEWSLETTER: Subscribe here for weekly content from AvePoint In 2018, Microsoft boasted about the fact that Microsoft Teams is now at feature parity with Skype for Business Online–a very important milestone, as it means that organisations can comfortably switch from Skype to Teams without sacrificing features.
Skype for Business Online will no longer be available and integration with third-party audio providers will cease. In July 2019, Microsoft officially announced the end-of-life for Skype for Business would be July 31, 2021. When is Skype for Business Being Replaced by Microsoft Teams?